Review – The Veil – National Theatre

by

As you may know I am a huge supporter of new writing, and for this reason alone bought tickets to The Veil as soon as the National Theater’s fall season went on sale. Ooh, new writing, and OOH ghost story, sounds great! And I managed to get £12 tickets (third row – to be honest it was actually too close) so I was all set for a night of spooky fun.

The signs looked good – a deliciously decrepit Irish manor – tales of suicide in the house – a girl (Emily Taafe) who hears spectral singing – a possibly haunted ancient tomb nearby – and all sorts of high quality actors on stage, including Fenella Woolgar (will never forget that profile after Time and the Conways), Jim Norton, and Adrian Schiller. The veil was lifted … and it all went downhill quite quickly. The characters seemed to be endlessly ticking boxes as they “created atmosphere” and “slowly revealed the story” – making sure all of the elements of spookiness were there without actually managing to cohere. Part of the problem had to be that each character wasn’t so much a stereotype as a non-entity – we had actors emoting their socks off but with dialogue as wooden as this, there was little hope of success.

I was also bothered by the play’s weak historicity – the 1820s were a very specific time in terms not just of famine in Ireland, but in terms of social relations – between parents and children, gentry and servants, and men and women. McPherson seems to only want the costumes, architecture, and superstition of the time, and has let everything else fall away. Maybe that’s why the characters were so unbelievable – like the ghosts they discuss, they are drifting around in search of time, with nothing rooting them. I, however, firmly felt time’s hold on me, as the minutes ticked by and I was forced to realize that instead of watching an engrossing story I was just watching a bunch of actors move around on a very well-dressed set. Could they not have shared some of their copious stash of (imaginary) hootch with us less-fortunates craning to see all from the third row? The answer was no, but I was able to satisfy my cravings to make my brief passage on this earth more valuable by taking my leave at the interval. I’ve heard it ran until 10:30 and did not improve; not so my evening which took a strong turn for the better as I sat enjoying the deliciously mild Indian summer on the patio of the National with fellow departee A.

So yes, I went to a first preview, and I left at the interval. Perhaps it will get better but at £12 for my ticket I felt I’d got my full value for my evening. My advice however: skip The Veil and just go to The Woman in Black, which I promise will have you sitting on the edge of your seat for the entire evening.

(This review is for the first preview of The Veil, which I saw on Tuesday, September 27th, 2011. Sadly I’m so turned off on this play there’s just no chance of me going back to see the rest of it later in the run. For a review of the entire play, see Ian Foster’s blog. And please don’t whinge on about how “oh you can’t review a preview,” this is the show AS I SAW IT and while it’s perfectly fair to say that it will keep evolving, my record of the evening as I experienced it will not be any less valid. If you’re going to say OH NOES BUT IT WAS A PREVIEW why don’t you just say instead what’s now different from the points that I criticized? But if you say HOW DARE YOU REVIEW A PREVIEW I’m just going to ignore you. You might as well say how dare you review a war that wasn’t won because it didn’t count and can we please look at a successful one instead. My review is a FULLY VALID account of the evening. Look on it as a news story and as such very vital for those looking for the lay of the land while the battle rages on.)

Advertisements

Tags: , , , ,

8 Responses to “Review – The Veil – National Theatre”

  1. Paul Says:

    I went to see The Veil last night (29th) and oh how I wish I had left at the interval. This really was turgid stuff and I think this review is absolutely spot on. This play doesnt need to evolve it needs to have a serious kick up the arse! Is it possible that this was the writer being over-indulgent as a director. Whatever I was so bored and certainly wont be going back

  2. Ian Says:

    You’re very full of yourself yet terribly defensive for a reviewer. I’ve yet to see The Veil but for a critic to be so terribly sensitive about criticism doesn’t make me think your opinion is very important. I’ll go and make my mind up either way but your sense of self righteousness means I won’t be bothering with your blog again.

    • webcowgirl Says:

      Ooh an unsupported ad hominem attack. Your threat to never read my blog is so …. What’s the opposite of devastated? Anyway, toodle pip.

  3. lizzie Says:

    I went to see this on Wednesday and left at the interval – am reassured to hear I made the right choice. Thanks!

  4. The Veil, National Theatre, London: Review « W[r]ite Noise NI Says:

    […] the blog reviews I read of The Veil before we went to see it (such as this one, this one, and even this one, in which the reviewer actually left at the interval) I won’t be trying to dissuade you from […]

  5. jessicaruano Says:

    I saw this show last night, and the second half was only slightly more entertaining than the first — and only because there was a good deal more screaming.

    re. Ian’s comment: despite his nasty tone, he has a point in that your last paragraph is unnecessary. As long as a reviewer points out that the performance she attended was a ‘preview’, then that’s all that needs to be said in terms of reviewing etiquette.

    Keep writing reviews; it’s not an easy job.

    • webcowgirl Says:

      I wasn’t seeing self righteous … my paragraph was a reminder to people to deal with my review on its merits, not on whether or not it is a preview. What I’ve seen over and over again is when I give a negative review of a preview people will say HOW DARE YOU REVIEW A PREVIEW but not address my critique of the show at all. What I want is responses where people say,”Well, actually XX was great” or even news about anything that _changed_ in the show, especially when it makes it better, but commentaries that actually add to the discussion. Oddly when I give positive reviews of a preview no one ever says, “Oh yeah but it got much worse later.” 🙂

  6. A year in blogging – Webcowgirl’s most popular posts of 2011 – and tips for improving your blog stats « Life in the Cheap Seats – Webcowgirl’s London theatre reviews Says:

    […] Review – The Veil – National Theatre1,492 […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: